Close Welcome writers, influencers and dreamers, make the world a greener place
Register here
Forgot password
Forgot password
or
or

Close
Close Stay Updated on Environmental Improvements And Global Innovations
Close Stay Updated on Environmental Improvements And Global Innovations
Close Reset password
your profile is 33% complete:
33%
Update profile Close
Close WhatsOrb Global Sustainability X-Change

For writers, influencers and dreamers who want to make the world a greener place.

WhatsOrb reaches monthly about 28.000 thousand visitors who want - like you - to make the world a greener place. Share your expertise and all can benefit.

Become an influencer and write and share sustainable news and innovations globally
Are you a writer or do you have ideas about sustainability which you want to share? Register and share your green knowledge and news. WhatsOrb offers you global exposure for your article.

If your article meets certain standards, you receive promotional gains like Facebook promotions and Google Ads advertising.

Climate climate change  the west of the us on fire | Upload General

Climate Change: The West of the US On Fire

by: Hans van der Broek
climate change  the west of the us on fire | Upload

The West of the US is burning, and there’s no relief in sight. More than 80 massive wildfires are raging in an area covering more than 1.4 million acres, primarily in California, Montana, and Oregon, according to the National Interagency Fire Center. Taken together, that’s a wildfire more massive than the state of Delaware.

Climate Change: The West Of The US On Fire

California has declared a state of emergency as wildfires burn outside Los Angeles and threaten giant sequoias in Yosemite National Park. In Oregon, the Eagle Creek fire is tearing through the scenic Columbia River Gorge. Seattle, Boise, and Denver are socked in under a haze of smoky air and ash that experts predict could linger until the first snowfall in the mountains.

But nowhere are the fires more devastating than in Montana, where more than 1 million acres of forest burned this summer, and more than  467,000 acres are currently burning in 26 large fires that line the mountainous western side of the state.

Recommended: Climate Change: China Floods The Arctic On Fire

The West of the US On Fire: Get Used To It

Philip Higuera, a professor of fire ecology at the University of Montana, is used to seeing smoky air from his office window in September, but nothing like the thick smoke filling Missoula Valley right now. He recently spoke to CityLab about the fires raging across the West, what we can do about them, and why this year’s big burn might be the new normal.
 
Breathing the air in Missoula today feels like chain-smoking Chesterfields. Schools aren’t letting the kids out at recess, and public health authorities are saying active adults and children should avoid outdoor exertion. It’s easy to get the impression that this is an extraordinary and unprecedented fire season. But you study forest fires over a timespan of thousands of years. How unusual or unique is this fire season?

It’s not—even in the context of the 21st century. In the Northern Rockies, we had a tremendous fire year in 2012, in 2007, in 2000, and to an extent in 2003. In this region, 1910 remains the record-setting fire season. If we surpass that, I would be surprised. Events like these are not frequent on a year-to-year scale. On the other hand, when you look at the role fire plays in ecosystems, you have to look at a longer timescale, and these rare events are what’s expected every once in a while.

Forest fire Rocky Mountains

Climate Change And Fire Season! Why So Dramatic?

The main reason there is so much burning right now is the intense seasonal drought across the region. The term we use is that these fires are 'climate enabled.' The drought makes most of the vegetation, live or dead, receptive to burning. In Missoula, we had the driest July and August on record and the third-warmest of July and August. With those types of conditions, we expect widespread burning. But people underestimate the role that seasonal climate plays in these events, and we start to grasp at lots of other things to explain it.

Recommended: Bushfires Australia Generate Their Own Weather

The West Of The US On Fire: Are Residents Safe?

Aside from that significant impact, I give a cautious yes. There is a risk. And that risk is highest in the wildland-urban interface. If you are living there, you should know that you are living with a much higher risk of exposure to wildfire. And part of the job of educators and U.S. Forest Service outreach is to make that risk known. Eventually, insurance companies will also get on board. Floods are obviously on insurance companies’ radar front and center. Wildfire is still not frequent enough that they design programs around it.

Fire-Prone West: Should You Live In A Place Like This?

Every place on our planet has some natural phenomenon that is not friendly to humans. If you live on the East Coast, you are going to experience hurricanes. If you live in the Midwest, you are going to experience tornadoes. If you live across forested regions in the West, you are going to experience wildfires. We need to develop in a way that is conscious of these processes—that is not ignorant of the way the planet and the environment you live in works. “These ecosystems are burning evolved with fire. We expect them to burn. We need them to burn if we want them to continue to exist.”

Recommended: Amazon Water War: Fires, Dams And Climate Change

Why Are These Fires So Hard To Put Out?

This goes back to why the fires are happening. The fuels are extremely dry. And most areas burn during extreme weather conditions—the days when it’s hot, humidity is low, and there are high winds. These are the conditions in which fires quickly double in size. They are also the conditions where it’s most dangerous to put people in front of the fire. Even, a lot of these fires start in very remote areas with rugged terrain, and just putting people on the ground comes with some risk. 
Montana alone has already spent tens of millions of dollars trying to suppress wildfires this summer, and two firefighters have been killed. Is that having any impact, or is it like driving down the expressway throwing bags of money out the window?
When you say it’s not working, the key question is, What’s the goal? “It’s not working” assumes the goal is to have no fires. We will fail if that is the goal. Most of these ecosystems that are burning have evolved with fire. We expect them to consume. We need them to burn if we want them to continue to exist.
Foers fire Montana

So It’s Like Trying To Stop The Rain?

It’s like trying to stop an earthquake, trying to stop a volcano. To me, the goal can’t be to have any fire. That’s gotten us into trouble when we pursued that goal. I think the metric should be how much area has burned that we wanted to burn compared to how much burned that we didn’t want to burn. Or closer to the nugget, how many resources were harmed—how many houses were lost, how many people were either directly or indirectly killed?

Recommended: India’s CO2, Pollution, Artificial Rain: How To Survive?

You Don’t See Raging Forest Fires As A Failure?

No. Knowing how climate enables and drives these large fires, I think that it would be impossible to put these fires out.

We Should Not Suppress Wildfires.  

I think as soon as you live in these environments, you will quickly abandon that too-simplistic view. Maybe when I was a graduate student living in Seattle, that seemed more like a possibility, but you can’t just let it burn. That would not be wise. It comes down to what you can afford to burn and what do you want to protect. If the fire is in the wilderness, that’s great. If it’s burning toward a community, that’s not so good.

There is A Good Fire And Bad Fire?

There is a spectrum. On one end of the spectrum would be the wildfire that is not going to impact anyone—good fire. The fire that burns down your house or kills people—lousy fire.

We Should Allow More Logging To Clear Trees And Help Prevent Wildfires.

I don’t think that holds water. That is based on the assumption that fires are occurring because there is more fuel available to burn than in the past. That’s generally not what’s driving this. It’s the drought. It’s true that if cut, there is less fuel in the forests. But in a lot of cases, there is what’s called slash—woody debris—left on the ground that will carry fire across the forest floor, which is what you need for it to spread.

The simple answer—if you want to eliminate fire, then pave it. There will be no fire.

Is Climate Change Partly To blame For This Year’s Fires? 

That’s what future climate models project. We can’t say this individual fire was because of climate change. We can’t say this year was because of climate change. But these types of years are what we expect to see more frequently. I heard an analogy that I think is useful. If a baseball player is using steroids and hits a home run, can you attribute that home run to steroids? You can’t—but you know that at some point, some component of that was brought to you by this artificial input to the system.

Before you go!

Recommended: Earth Matters. Nature And Us: What Was, What’s Left: Hope?

Did you find this an interesting article, or do you have a question or remark? Leave a comment below.
We try to respond the same day.

Like to write your article about the effect of climate change in your neighborhood?
Click on 'Register' or push the button 'Write An Article' on the 'HomePage.'

Messange
You
Share this post

Hans van der Broek, founder

Founder and CEO of WhatsOrb, world traveller, entrepreneur and environmental activist. Hans has countless ideas and has set up several businesses in the Netherlands and abroad. He also has an opinion on everything and unlimited thoughts about how to create a better world. He likes hiking and has climbed numerous five-thousanders (mountain summits of at least 5000m or 16,404 feet in elevation)

 

Hans van der Broek, founder

Founder and CEO of WhatsOrb, world traveller, entrepreneur and environmental activist. Hans has countless ideas and has set up several businesses in the Netherlands and abroad. He also has an opinion on everything and unlimited thoughts about how to create a better world. He likes hiking and has climbed numerous five-thousanders (mountain summits of at least 5000m or 16,404 feet in elevation)

 

Stay Updated on Environmental Improvements And Global Innovations
SIGN UP FOR MONTHLY TIPS & TRICKS
More like this:

Climate Change: The West of the US On Fire

The West of the US is burning, and there’s no relief in sight. More than 80 massive wildfires are raging in an area covering more than 1.4 million acres, primarily in California, Montana, and Oregon, according to the National Interagency Fire Center. Taken together, that’s a wildfire more massive than the state of Delaware. Climate Change: The West Of The US On Fire California has declared a state of emergency as wildfires burn outside Los Angeles and threaten giant sequoias in Yosemite National Park. In Oregon, the Eagle Creek fire is tearing through the scenic Columbia River Gorge. Seattle, Boise, and Denver are socked in under a haze of smoky air and ash that experts predict could linger until the first snowfall in the mountains. But nowhere are the fires more devastating than in Montana, where more than 1 million acres of forest burned this summer, and more than  467,000 acres are currently burning in 26 large fires that line the mountainous western side of the state. Recommended:  Climate Change: China Floods The Arctic On Fire The West of the US On Fire: Get Used To It Philip Higuera, a professor of fire ecology at the University of Montana, is used to seeing smoky air from his office window in September, but nothing like the thick smoke filling Missoula Valley right now. He recently spoke to CityLab about the fires raging across the West, what we can do about them, and why this year’s big burn might be the new normal.   Breathing the air in Missoula today feels like chain-smoking Chesterfields. Schools aren’t letting the kids out at recess, and public health authorities are saying active adults and children should avoid outdoor exertion. It’s easy to get the impression that this is an extraordinary and unprecedented fire season. But you study forest fires over a timespan of thousands of years. How unusual or unique is this fire season? It’s not—even in the context of the 21st century. In the Northern Rockies, we had a tremendous fire year in 2012, in 2007, in 2000, and to an extent in 2003. In this region, 1910 remains the record-setting fire season. If we surpass that, I would be surprised. Events like these are not frequent on a year-to-year scale. On the other hand, when you look at the role fire plays in ecosystems, you have to look at a longer timescale, and these rare events are what’s expected every once in a while. Climate Change And Fire Season! Why So Dramatic? The main reason there is so much burning right now is the intense seasonal drought across the region. The term we use is that these fires are 'climate enabled.' The drought makes most of the vegetation, live or dead, receptive to burning. In Missoula, we had the driest July and August on record and the third-warmest of July and August. With those types of conditions, we expect widespread burning. But people underestimate the role that seasonal climate plays in these events, and we start to grasp at lots of other things to explain it. Recommended:  Bushfires Australia Generate Their Own Weather The West Of The US On Fire: Are Residents Safe? Aside from that significant impact, I give a cautious yes. There is a risk. And that risk is highest in the wildland-urban interface. If you are living there, you should know that you are living with a much higher risk of exposure to wildfire. And part of the job of educators and U.S. Forest Service outreach is to make that risk known. Eventually, insurance companies will also get on board. Floods are obviously on insurance companies’ radar front and center. Wildfire is still not frequent enough that they design programs around it. Fire-Prone West: Should You Live In A Place Like This? Every place on our planet has some natural phenomenon that is not friendly to humans. If you live on the East Coast, you are going to experience hurricanes. If you live in the Midwest, you are going to experience tornadoes. If you live across forested regions in the West, you are going to experience wildfires. We need to develop in a way that is conscious of these processes—that is not ignorant of the way the planet and the environment you live in works. “These ecosystems are burning evolved with fire. We expect them to burn. We need them to burn if we want them to continue to exist.” Recommended:  Amazon Water War: Fires, Dams And Climate Change Why Are These Fires So Hard To Put Out? This goes back to why the fires are happening. The fuels are extremely dry. And most areas burn during extreme weather conditions—the days when it’s hot, humidity is low, and there are high winds. These are the conditions in which fires quickly double in size. They are also the conditions where it’s most dangerous to put people in front of the fire. Even, a lot of these fires start in very remote areas with rugged terrain, and just putting people on the ground comes with some risk.  Montana alone has already spent tens of millions of dollars trying to suppress wildfires this summer, and two firefighters have been killed. Is that having any impact, or is it like driving down the expressway throwing bags of money out the window? When you say it’s not working, the key question is, What’s the goal? “It’s not working” assumes the goal is to have no fires. We will fail if that is the goal. Most of these ecosystems that are burning have evolved with fire. We expect them to consume. We need them to burn if we want them to continue to exist. So It’s Like Trying To Stop The Rain? It’s like trying to stop an earthquake, trying to stop a volcano. To me, the goal can’t be to have any fire. That’s gotten us into trouble when we pursued that goal. I think the metric should be how much area has burned that we wanted to burn compared to how much burned that we didn’t want to burn. Or closer to the nugget, how many resources were harmed—how many houses were lost, how many people were either directly or indirectly killed? Recommended:  India’s CO2, Pollution, Artificial Rain: How To Survive? You Don’t See Raging Forest Fires As A Failure? No. Knowing how climate enables and drives these large fires, I think that it would be impossible to put these fires out. We Should Not Suppress Wildfires.   I think as soon as you live in these environments, you will quickly abandon that too-simplistic view. Maybe when I was a graduate student living in Seattle, that seemed more like a possibility, but you can’t just let it burn. That would not be wise. It comes down to what you can afford to burn and what do you want to protect. If the fire is in the wilderness, that’s great. If it’s burning toward a community, that’s not so good. There is A Good Fire And Bad Fire? There is a spectrum. On one end of the spectrum would be the wildfire that is not going to impact anyone—good fire. The fire that burns down your house or kills people—lousy fire. We Should Allow More Logging To Clear Trees And Help Prevent Wildfires. I don’t think that holds water. That is based on the assumption that fires are occurring because there is more fuel available to burn than in the past. That’s generally not what’s driving this. It’s the drought. It’s true that if cut, there is less fuel in the forests. But in a lot of cases, there is what’s called slash—woody debris—left on the ground that will carry fire across the forest floor, which is what you need for it to spread. The simple answer—if you want to eliminate fire, then pave it. There will be no fire. Is Climate Change Partly To blame For This Year’s Fires?  That’s what future climate models project. We can’t say this individual fire was because of climate change. We can’t say this year was because of climate change. But these types of years are what we expect to see more frequently. I heard an analogy that I think is useful. If a baseball player is using steroids and hits a home run, can you attribute that home run to steroids? You can’t—but you know that at some point, some component of that was brought to you by this artificial input to the system. Before you go! Recommended:  Earth Matters. Nature And Us: What Was, What’s Left: Hope? Did you find this an interesting article, or do you have a question or remark? Leave a comment below. We try to respond the same day. Like to write your article about the effect of climate change in your neighborhood? Click on  'Register'  or push the button 'Write An Article' on the  'HomePage.'
Stay Updated on Environmental Improvements And Global Innovations